-
Website
http://www.dembot.com/ -
Original page
http://dembot.com/post/54907217 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Daniel Ha
6 comments · 407 points
-
sunoxen
5 comments · 2 points
-
jeffmarks7
10 comments · 4 points
-
David Sanger
4 comments · 7 points
-
iconjohn
10 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
A Decade In History of Online Video
11 hours ago · 10 comments
-
TV Everywhere Launches
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Video Distribution Trending Towards Centralization
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Why News Won't Work Like Murdoch Want's It To
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
A Decade In History of Online Video
This indeed superfantastical! I'm SO glad!
Seriously, I hope you're still able to sue the hell out of Biogen, anyone who screws with a friend of Clinton or Edwards should PAY THE PRICE!
I can understand the companies resistance as Tysabri has been under intense scrutiny. Two patients recently got PML from Tysabri and many feel that those side effects will significantly reduce demand for the drug. Two companies have a large stake in this drug and their futures depend on it. The stocks of these companies were crushed when news of recent PML cases arose. Future negative news regarding Tysabri could negatively affect perceptions about the drug. Biogen has predicted 100,000 patients on the drug in 2 years, and by them taking risks the companies futures are risked. If there was no PML risk I'm sure he would have agreed sooner. The fact that your doctor couldn'\t just give it to him is a testament to how much scrutiny the drug is under - one more side effect could destroy it regardless of how good it is.
All companies currently have the power to choose who they do business with - and to take that away would mean that we would become the first pure communist country. And maybe that is OK, but then your extreme wealth needs to be put back in the pot for all to share. And I bet that is not OK.
I really am happy for your Dad and think that is a product is on the market then docs should be able to prescribe off-label. However, you obtained a waiver for your Dad due to extraordinary influence, and that option is not available to the vast majority. I would bet that Biogen would gladly allow off-label Rx for Tysabri if that were allowed generally - but it is not. The other 70,000 US MM patients do not have the option that your Dad has - and they should.
I doubt that Biogen is the enemy here. They and Elan Pharmaceuticals developed the drug and want people to use it. But they do not want use off-label to jeopardize approved uses for patients. The Barons are in a position to help correct the system: use your influence to make changes to remove the liability overhang that threatens pharmaceutical companies and makes it more difficult to bring effective treatments to patients.
USA is so corrupted that is beyond repair.
Hope Baron gets well enough to sue the big pharmas again.
There is no justice after all!
If you were as beautiful and important as Fred and Andrew are, believe me, we would be pushing you to have access to the drug.
Sorry
You must have lived in Russia or China before WW2, or must be a Democrap who committed woman-slaughter by driving over that damn bridge and got away with it.
This is sad.....
After that, I think he will sue the hell out of J. Mullen for delaying the approval of Ty so that he suffered needlessly for 48 hours. He should ask for $500,000,000 in compensation from Mullen and Biogen.
Robbie Cohen
I am pulling for you and your family.
My Best Wishes from "Od Europe"..
Vic Rogers
I am so very proud of you. It is heartrendering to see what you have done for your Father. And, I don't think a Father could love his son more. My prayers and thoughts will be with you and your family each second of the day as I know thousands of others will be as well. All my love to you, Deborah Rubin Marlin
Right now, the MAYO CLINIC doesn't even show on it's clinical trials website that there is a trial with TYSABRI for myeloma. Nor does the clinicaltrials.gov website for the "natalizumab trial for myeloma" mention either the MAYO CLINIC or TYSABRI....
....so others can get TYSABRI, too!
Wendell Wood, Fairborn, OH
Thanks for the text. Ed and I are grateful that persistence prevailed and he received the Tysabri. Thanks for keeping us posted. I know you must be exhausted so your updates to us are valued greatly. It is an absolute travesty that it took a former president to make obtaining this medicine possible. Our healthcare system truly is a crisis because most people don't have the ability to have a former president be their advocate. Your dad has always fought for the little guy who didn't have an advocate so it's wonderful to know that someone fought for him and prevailed. I know this must be such a relief. Please tell Lisa and the rest of your family that Ed and Angela Moody are deep in prayer for their strength and tell Fred we are praying for him and to keep fighting.
Best of luck to your dad.
KM
In my own personal opinion, Biogen should not be allowed the ultimate decision on who gets the drug, and who doesn't get the drug. I think the government should have the ultimate decision. The government decides what to do based on justice, whereas Biogen is a company that decides what to do based on money. Mr. Mullen's job in steering the company is to make as much money as possible and Mr. Mullen seems to have no compassion.
It's very possible that Biogen could have a different kind of a CEO who was no less concerned about making as much money as possible, but also had human compassion. It's a difference in style. Some would argue that having compassion would itself lead to more money.
When this very important drug was removed from the market a couple of years ago, it was because Biogen decided on their own to stop the distribution, causing a lot of people a lot of strife, determining that **nobody** would be allowed to have to the drug.
All of these decisions about who gets it and when are very convoluted and I think that the government for justice should have the ultimate say.
While many drug companies act responsibly, Biogen should not ever be in a position to ultimately decide because human life is clearly more valuable than money.
I sincerely wish well to your dad and pray that he will WALK OUT of the freaken Mayo hell very soon.
There is hope straight ahead.
I hope your Dad gets better fast as a result of your efforts. But, it is a little ironic that your Dad made off-label use expensive to pharma companies themselves in the past - resulting in their being gun shy. Maybe when he returns to full health, he can bring his considerable intellect and money to bear to make it possible for doctors to prescribe what they think is best.
I am very pleased that you were able to obtain the drug and I'm sorry that you had to do so in such a stressful situation. But your response greatly upsets me. I plead with you to respect the incredibly difficult decision that Biogen Idec had made. Mr. Mullen is weighting a lot of factors, a good number of them independent of money and you should acknowledge the existence of those factors. It is very important that you take advantage of the large media attention and your influence to change this restrictive system in place and not create a witchhunt out it.
As a scientist myself, I am skeptical about the scientific basis of the Mayo Clinic and concerned about the lack of Phase I data but I wish your father the best since cancer is disease that haunts us all. The best happy ending for everyone is if this drug truly is a miracle. I pray for you and your family.
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/10/17/lance-ar...
"Justice" has nothing to do with safety or efficacy and in any case probably doesn't include the people most afraid of innovation being the first to benefit from it due to political influence. How exactly are you going to fine a "druge justice czar" who can make better decisions? If anything, we need to remove restrictions and delegate as much decisions making as possible to the people most concerned, usually doctors and patients, by using the govt to insure that quality, accurate information is available long before people are confronted with situations similar to yours.
Everytime a legal person doesn't get his way, he starts calling innovators greedy or some other term. Is this a joke? You can't possibly be serious.
God bless
This sounds very much like the story of Beth Wolmer, who some years ago went through a similar experience in securing thalidomide for her husband. At the time, thalidomide was only authorized for use in treating leprosy. It has since become a standard treatment for myeloma and has spawned derivative drugs that are also being used and/or are in trials for myeloma. Her story can be found in the New York Times at http://tinyurl.com/62km9q.
As an 18 year myeloma survivor and a member of the board of the International Myeloma Foundation, I reiterate my congratulations and hope that this drug will work for your father and ultimately find its way into the arsenal we have to fight this horrible disease.
Michael Katz
Bravo to you for your eloquent no holds barred letter. How inconceivable it is that a pharmaceutical company would have a drug so readily available and NOT bend over backwards (with proper releases) to make it available. I deeply hope that this not only saves Fred's life but becomes a watershed event for all business to reflect on what they do and why they do it. Fred, we love you and are pulling for you!
Gary
year battle with MM my husband died earlier this month in terrible pain and
agony. I had never heard of tysabri but Revlimid extended his life about two and
one half years.
All of you being so hard on the drug company should be aware that many of us who
suffer from RA would give everything we have to get our drugs which were effective
back after massive class action law suits forced their withdrawal from the market. Not
many things in this complicated world can effectively be seen as being either black or
white (or only good or bad).
As a shareholder, I read your blog with concern that Mr. Mullen has been so uncooperative. Please forward your information to Jim Cramer's blog and to Carl Ichan's blog. Mr. Mullen should be placed on Jim Cramer's Wall of Shame! Carl Ichan has been attempting to oust him as well.
"The FDA has provided no such assurance to the company. Our policy is to consider all available information when evaluating the safety and effectiveness of drugs. We recognize and appreciate that expanded access programs involve less-controlled use of experimental treatments than the well-controlled environment of a clinical trial, and thus we would consider information that might be obtained in this instance within that context.”
contrast this with your claim:
". In other words, considering the life and death circumstances, if the drug did not work or if it caused an adverse reaction, the FDA would be willing to exclude this data from any future considerations against the company."
this makes you a liar: fda said it would consider the information within the extraordinary circumstances, which is very, very different from excluding it.
FDA also does not choose to apply its laws depending on if an individual knows senators or not. It cannot -- it would be liable to many lawsuits. Thus should FDA mandate access to Tysabri to all multiple myeloma patients positive for this marker?
Also:
President Bill Clinton, Senator John Kerry, Senator John Harkin, Senator Ted Kennedy, Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach and others who you spoke with on Friday and again yesterday on Monday have all pleaded with you to say “yes”, assuring you that there would be no legal risk and no negative consequences to your company if something went wrong, but you continue to say “no”.
This is misleading. In America, as you well know, if something is legal or not is decided by the courts, not Bill Clinton or John Harkin. No one can assure you there will be "no legal risk", especially not a bunch of senators.
We wish your father a speedy and full recovery and that he is back on the golf course before you know it.
Suzann Richard and Sam Richard
It would be a good turn for your father to use his clout to better the survival and quality of life opportunities for patients who desperately need Tysabri, but are challenged due to unreasonable restrictions on it's use. You were able to convince the FDA to allow your Dad to get Tysbari, the Mayo Clinic also found cause to fight for this compassionate use, why not fight for others to get the same treatment, if they are found to be at death's door for a lack of therapies that could extend their remaining days.
I realize your father made a successful career in litigation representing people afflicted with diseases secondary to exposure to various toxic substances, but he also has great knowledge and experience and contacts, no doubt, in litigation matters with pharmaceuticals. It would see that those who supported your Dad's effort for access to Tysabri would surely come to the aid of others so afflicted with multiple myeloma, and hasten their access to this potential life extending medication.
After all, what do they have left? Not much more that your Dad did just a few short days ago.
Regards,
James Mc Gowan
One day soon, I will post an update on the details of how we obtained Tysabri in hopes that others might benefit. I personally think the drug may turn out to be everything we expected but may have come too late. Anyone who is concerned that this special use of Tysabri granted to my Dad was unfair or effected others negatively should know that over the last several years, my father donated at least $1,000,000 to Mayo to conduct research on MM which led to this discovery of Tysabri as a possible cure for his disease (the main reason why I personally think James C. Mullen and Naomi Aoki are COMPLETELY evil, to put it nicely).
From Lance Armstrong:
http://livestrongblog.org/2008/10/30/rip-fred-b...
From the Dallas Morning News:
http://dembot.com/post/57248104/frederick-marti...